Over the past years, the issue of global warming has becoming increasingly more prominent in the news and in the minds of millions of people over the world. Since there are more immediate problems with our society, such as war and the economy slump, climate change does not get as much of the media’s attention as some argue it should. As Al Gore said in the documentary An Inconvenient Truth, “it takes time to connect the dots, I know that. But I also know that there can be a day of reckoning when you wish you had connected the dots more quickly.” By saying this, Gore is making it clear that climate change is an ever-growing problem that we are facing and one day, potentially in the near future, we may all look back and wish we had done something to stop it when we had the chance.
Throughout An Inconvenient Truth, Gore reiterates his main point in many different ways; that climate change is occurring whether we acknowledge it or not, and the quicker we act upon it, the more likely it will be that we can do something to help. The more that we contribute to stopping climate change, the more efficient it will be in creating a healthier planet and environment. An Inconvenient Truth won the category of “Best Film, Documentary, or Website Focusing on Global Warming” in the 2007 Global Warming Globie Awards with 82% of the vote, which would give the illusion that it is a credible source of information. However, that may not be the case. I do think that the information Gore provides in An Inconvenient Truth is factual, however I question whether it would have won all the awards it had if someone else other than Gore had been the main character. I definitely think it helped boost the documentary’s morale that Gore was the one who produced it and spoke in it, because he is such a well-known name. But that makes me wonder whether or not people voted for the movie based on the facts it provided or based on who made it.
To support his main point, Gore uses many different forms of information. He provides information in the source of graphs, pictures, statistics, and quotes from scientists about climate change. By using a various number of resources to support his point, I believe it makes the information he is providing more convincing because he is not just using one type of information; he is using a broad spectrum to convey his position. Gore also uses certain stories of his childhood to clarify how global warming can affect our lives, whether or not we see it as such.
His childhood stories appeal to pathos because he is trying to obtain some type of emotional sentiment from the audience. For example, he talks about how his family grew tobacco, but that his sister died of lung cancer from smoking her entire life. Even though Gore tries to connect this to global warming, it could also be said that he is just trying to gain understanding for his character. If a character can extract some sort of empathy from the audience, I believe that makes the audience more likely to agree with whatever that certain character is saying, regardless of the audience’s initial feelings. I do not think that it is necessarily a bad thing to feel empathy for Gore, but it could just be used as a persuasive tactic.
Even if we do not recognize climate change as a problem that needs immediate attention, we cannot ignore the fact that the human race is affecting climate change. In an article in The New York Times, the author states “scientists learned long ago that the earth's climate has powerfully shaped the history of the human species — biologically, culturally and geographically. But only in the last few decades has research revealed that humans can be a powerful influence on the climate as well.” Gore also said that by stating humans were a cause of global warming in An Inconvenient Truth. I thought this was a powerful statement to make because he is attempting to make people who watch the movie think about how they as an individual have affected the environment in some way.
Around the time An Inconvenient Truth was released in 2006, there were other videos and articles being released about global warming as well. One in particular has really stuck with me, and that is the band 30 Seconds To Mars’ video for their song “A Beautiful Lie.” For their music video, the band traveled to the Arctic Circle and filmed on location for it. Given that both of these were released around the time period, it leads me to believe that global warming was becoming a more prominent problem even back then. Since then, I think that global warming/climate change has become a more common topic of discussion because of all the different types of media that has focused on it.
And even though we hear many facts about global warming on a weekly basis, there are still many people in the world who are refusing to act on this information. In the article “Why the IPCC Bomb Was a Dud,” author David Roberts states “knowing and understanding is not a passive process of absorbing facts. It's an active process.” This is also an idea that Gore stresses in An Inconvenient Truth. I have also heard this statement over and over again, but Gore did something different in the film that provided new insight (for me at least) into being proactive about making a difference.
He gave examples of easy steps citizens could take to reduce carbon emissions, and actually showed on a graph how it quickly it could be reduced. Gore said “each one of us is a cause of global warming, but each of us can make choices to change that with the things we buy, with the electricity we use, the cars we drive.” He also stated that by changing the way we live our everyday lives to become more eco-friendly, eventually the carbon emission would be below the level it was in 1970. I considered this an influential idea because it allowed me to see that by changing certain things, I would actually be making a difference in the long run.
However, in a rebuttal article by The Washington Post, it is said “the trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral crusade when it's really an engineering problem. The inconvenient truth is that if we don't solve the engineering problem, we're helpless” (Samuelson). This is stating that it necessarily is not a problem that has to deal with people, but with engineering, and is the opposite of what Gore said. I am not quite sure which to believe, but in An Inconvenient Truth, the facts that were provided in a logical and easy way to understand, while the concept in this article is hard to grasp. Because of this, it makes me more prone to believe Gore’s point, which could possibly be what Gore wants. Maybe he presented the information in a way that would be easy to grasp, but also in a way that would be easily believable.
Overall, I thought that An Inconvenient Truth was an effective documentary. Whether or not it was because of the main character being an old “next president of the United States” who presented the information in a way that was designed to have everyone believe him is still up for debate. There were many helpful points that Gore made, but in the end I am not sure whether or not I believed him based on the factual evidence given, or because of whom he is as a powerful person in our society.
Works Cited
An Inconvenient Truth: Transcript. Forum Politics, 2007. Web. 27 October 2010.
“Global Warming.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 6 October 2010. Web. 24 October 2010.
Roberts, David. “Why The IPCC Bomb Was A Dud.” The Huffington Post. HuffingtonPost.com, Inc., 6 February 2007. Web. 24 October 2010.
Samuelson, Robert J. “Global Warming’s Real Inconvenient Truth.” The Washington Post. The Washington Post Company, 5 July 2006. Web. 26 October 2010.
“The 2007 Global Warming Globie Awards.” Environmental Defense Fund. Environmental Defense Fund, 2007. Web. 26 October 2010.